Fakta
Fakta
In women with diabetes, optimal glycaemic control before and during pregnancy is important to prevent an adverse pregnancy outcome, including congenital malformations and foetal overgrowth [1]. Patient education and involvement is crucial in order to improve diabetes self-management and glycaemic control prior to and during pregnancy [2]. A smartphone application (app) is an easily accessible tool that can communicate important health information. Several apps are already available for the non-pregnant population with diabetes,
and they may have positive effects on glycaemic control [3, 4].
In 2013, a patient (HMJ) initiated collaboration with the staff at Centre for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, to develop the smartphone app “Pregnant with Diabetes”. The primary target group for the app is pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes, but the app also includes information for women with gestational diabetes specifically, as well as for women with
diabetes who are planning pregnancy. The aim of the app is to communicate clinically important antenatal health information to women with diabetes, and that enhanced knowledge at the patient level will lead to improved pregnancy outcomes. The app is an educational tool that includes evidence-based clinical recommendations from our centre [5]. The intention is to communicate such information in an easily understandable language tailored to the patients. Danish and English versions of the app have been available since 2014. In 2015, a Swedish version was launched and a version tailored for Australia was added in 2016 [6].
To our knowledge, the use of an informative app designed for pregnant women with diabetes has not previously been explored. The app technology easily crosses national borders, and the aim of the present study was to evaluate the awareness and use of the app locally, nationally and internationally.
METHODS
The app (Table 1)
includes the following 13 topics of importance for motivating and executing self-care of diabetes treatment during pregnancy and in the pregnancy planning phase; “What is diabetes”, “Pregnancy planning”, “Possible complications”, “Blood glucose”, “Weight gain”, “Diet and carbohydrates”, “Physical activity”, “The foetus”, ”Insulin dose”, “In need of assistance”, “Scans”, “Delivery” and “After birth”. Every topic can be selected from a wheel of illustrative icons on the front page of the app (Figure 1). The app is available free of charge at Google Play and App Store.
In the period from May 2015 to February 2017, a total of 274 pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes) were referred to the Centre for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. At their first antenatal visit, the women were given an anonymous, structured questionnaire regarding the use and knowledge of the app. Women with gestational diabetes were not included.
The questionnaire was developed for the present study and included 13 questions in total. The questions covered awareness of and access to the app, use of the app before and during pregnancy, how the women preferred to receive antenatal health information (Table 1) and topics most frequently visited (Table 2).
The women were also asked how many times they had used the app, and if the app made them feel more secure. Furthermore, they were asked about their diabetes type and glycated haemoglobin level (HbA1c) at their first antenatal visit (questions 8-11). HbA1c reflects the average blood glucose levels over the past three months, and thus HbA1c at the first antenatal visit reflects blood glucose in the planning phase as well. Questions 12 and 13 were optional and allowed the respondents to provide proposals for improvement of and comments to the app and were not included in this paper. Questionnaires were obtained from 175 (64%) of the 274 women whereof 36 were excluded due to missing information on diabetes type (question 10), leaving available questionnaires from 139 (51%) women (96 with Type 1 diabetes and 43 with Type 2 diabetes). National and international data on the use of the app were obtained from Google Play, from the App Store and from Google Analytics in July 2017 [7]. Access to Google Play, the App Store and Google Analytics was administered by the app administrator (HMJ). The total number of national and international downloads of the app was collected in Google Play and in the App Store. Google Analytics was initially implemented in the app in order to track data regarding the use of the app. The following data were collected in July 2017 from Google Analytics: The countries with at least one download of the app, the frequency of visits to the different topics in the app in total, the average time used per access to the app (minutes) and if the app was used more than one time by the same user (repeated user).
Statistical analyses
The results are given as mean ± standard deviation or median (range) for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables. Results are presented for all included women as well as for women with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes separately. Unanswered questions that were considered relevant for the respondent were classified as missing data. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Trial registration: not relevant.
RESULTS
The vast majority of pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes owned a smartphone (99%) and were aware of the app (95%), mainly from their local diabetes centres (43%) or from our centre (31%) (Table 1). At the first
antenatal visit, 75% of the women had downloaded the app (Table 1) and used it up to ten times with a median of two times (question 8). Of those who had downloaded the app, 48% had obtained information from the app before their pregnancy (Table 1).
Data on HbA1c in early pregnancy was reported in 87% of the questionnaires (question 11). HbA1c was 6.5 ± 3.1% (48 ± 10.8 mmol/mol) by those who had used the app in the planning phase (question 5) of their pregnancy compared with 6.7 ± 3.4% (50 ± 13.3 mmol/mol) by those first obtaining knowledge from the app in early pregnancy (p = 0.47) (question 5).
The topics most frequently visited (Table 2) were “Blood glucose”, “The foetus” and “Insulin dose” among the total cohort of women with pre-existing diabetes and among women with Type 1 diabetes. For women with Type 2 diabetes, the most frequently visited topics were “Diet and carbohydrates”, “Blood glucose” and “What is diabetes”.
The majority of the women (70%) reported that the app made them feel more secure about their diabetes and pregnancy (question 9). Most women (77%) preferred to receive antenatal health information via an app, either unaccompanied or in combination with a paper sheet and/or a homepage (Table 1). Only 23% preferred a paper sheet and/or homepage.
In July 2017, the app had been downloaded 4,465 times in Denmark and 27,361 times in 183 different countries worldwide, mainly in developed countries but also in developing countries (Figure 2).
A total of 55% of the knowledge seekers worldwide were repeated users with an average use of three minutes per access to the app. The topics most frequently visited worldwide were “Diet and carbohydrates”, “Blood glucose” and “Possible complications”. The three countries with the highest numbers of users were The United States of America, Denmark and Australia for iOS (Apple) smartphones and The United States of America, India and Denmark for Android smartphone.
DISCUSSION
In a local cohort of pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes we observed a frequent use of the app “Pregnant with Diabetes”, with half of the users obtaining information from the app already when planning their pregnancy. The majority of the women preferred to receive the patient-tailored antenatal healthcare information via app technology rather than by paper sheets.
Internationally, the app was downloaded by almost 22,000 individuals covering the majority of countries worldwide. The educational information in this app probably does reach the local, national and international community of pregnant women with diabetes much
easier than a book or leaflet. Additionally, an app may updated more easily, and the information specifying the topics most frequently visited in the app affords the
authors with an opportunity to focus and update specific information.
The information included in the app was evidence-based at the highest possible level as judged by two experienced clinical scientists in the area of diabetes and pregnancy with both obstetric and endocrine experience [5]. During development of the app, it was decided to include educational information without other facilities, such as a feedback system between patients and their caregivers. It is, however, possible to combine the use of the app “Pregnant with Diabetes” with other apps, for example an app for carbohydrate counting and also apps for calculation of meal-time insulin dose based on the individual carbohydrate-to-insulin ratio.
Today, smartphones are widely used among women of childbearing age, and nearly all of the pregnant
women in our population have a smartphone [8]. The app technology is also widely used in other countries such as the United States of America and India, where rates of smartphone ownership are similar across ethnic groups and communities with different levels of income and access to healthcare [8, 9].
Several apps for patients with diabetes are available [10], but to our knowledge this study is the first to explore the awareness and use of an informative app, designed for pregnant women with diabetes and those planning their pregnancy. This study includes single centre questionnaire-based data in pregnant women with diabetes. To improve the applicability (external validity), data on national and international downloads of the app were also included. Women followed at our centre, where the app was developed, may be more aware of the app than women visiting other centres, and our centre may therefore have a higher number of users of the app than other diabetes centres, which may bias our findings. Nevertheless, our results show that the majority of the women knew the app from their local diabetes centre. It is a limitation that only 51% of the women referred to our centre in the study period completed the questionnaire, which may also bias our findings. However, the missing dataset was related mainly to days when the nurses were busy and had to prioritise their clinical work over the collection of research questions, suggesting that the dataset may be considered to be representative of the whole population.
The large number of downloads may represent the use of the app by both women with diabetes and by healthcare professionals or relatives. The use of the app by healthcare professionals, in Denmark and internationally, may be important to upgrade their own knowledge about diabetes and pregnancy, but also to guide the patients in selecting appropriate apps with evidence-based knowledge within this field [11, 12].
The information in the app reached half of the women in the pregnancy planning phase and the majority were repeated users, which documents a clinically relevant awareness and use of the app. The app contributes knowledge about the importance of good glycaemic control and folic acid intake prior to pregnancy, which may lead to a reduced prevalence of malformations in women with pre-existing diabetes. Data from this study point in the direction of a lower HbA1c in early pregnancy in those who used the app in the pregnancy planning phase. Knowledge from the app may have a positive influence on the obtained glycaemic control in early pregnancy, but the women seeking the information may also have a better compliance in general and be able to obtain better glycaemic control than the less privileged part of our patient population. Future studies including a qualitative assessment of the women’s experiences from their use of the app are needed to further elucidate whether the app contributes significantly to an improved glycaemic control and pregnancy outcome in women with pre-existing diabetes.
The present patient population comes from a society with a high level of daily internet use and computer skills, and the women had generally obtained good glycaemic control. HbA1c was self-reported based on measurement performed the same day, and at a similar level as previously reported in a similar patient population from our centre [13]. The results are probably applicable to other societies, including Third World countries. App technology may have the potential to provide information and reach otherwise inaccessible women in rural
areas and third world countries [8]. Worldwide, use of smartphones is increasing, and on average half of the world’s population now use a smartphone [14]; these figures are probably even higher among young women of childbearing age.
CONCLUSIONS
The app “Pregnant with Diabetes” is widely known and used, and antenatal health information in an app
is preferred to other media by pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes. Information via app technology has the potential to reach the women immediately,
even in rural areas and developing countries. Improved knowledge obtained from the app may contribute to
improved pregnancy planning and outcome - locally,
nationally and internationally.
Correspondence: Sidse Kjærhus Nørgaard.
E-mail: sidse.kjaerhus.noergaard1@regionh.dk/ sidsenorgaard@hotmail.com
Accepted: 23 August 2017
Conflicts of interest: none. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at www.danmedj.dk
Acknowledgements: The authors wish to extend their gratitude to Helle Løvschall, Signe Lou-Møller and Birgitta Ellingsgaard for collecting the questionnaires.
Referencer
LITERATURE
Jensen DM, Damm P, Moelsted-Pedersen L et al. Outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a nationwide, population-based study. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2819-23.
Duke SA, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:CD005268.
Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML et al. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care 2011;349:1934-42.
Garabedian LF, Ross-Degnan D, Wharam JF. Mobile phone and smartphone technologies for diabetes care and self-management. Curr Diab Rep 2015;1512:109.
Mathiesen ER. Pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes-lessons learned from clinical research: The 2015 Norbert Freinkel Award Lecture. Diabetes Care 2016;3912:2111-7.
Damm P, Juul HM. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pregnant-with-diabetes/id797791382?mt=8 (20 Jan 2017).
https://www.google.dk/intl/da/analytics/ (10 Aug 2017).
Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Ram J et al. Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: a prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013;13:191-8.
Center PR. Mobile technology fact sheet. www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/ (30 Jan 2017)
Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res 2014;164:e104.
Hale K, Capra S, Bauer J. A framework to assist health professionals in recommending high-quality apps for supporting chronic disease self-management: illustrative assessment of type 2 diabetes apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;33:e87.
Brandell B, Ford C. Diabetes professionals must seize the opportunity in mobile health. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013;76:1616-20.
Nørgaard SK, Do NC, Asbjörnsdóttir B et al. Prepregnancy body mass index and offspring birth weight in women with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. J Preg Child Health 2016;3:244.
Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and Internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/ (11 Aug 2017).