Skip to main content

Adolescent girls in Denmark use oral contraceptives at an increasingly young age, and with more pauses and shifts

Ellen Løkkegaard & Anne Kristine Nielsen,

1. okt. 2014
11 min.

Fakta

Fakta

In Europe, there is considerable variety in the frequency of use of oral contraceptives and in the age at which these are initiated [1, 2]. It has been described that adolescent girls in Scandinavian countries and Germany start using hormonal contraceptives earlier than women in other European countries [2]. In Denmark, around 140 million defined daily dosages of hormonal contraceptives have been sold annually during the past ten years. It is primarily young women aged 20-24 years who use of oral contraceptives, and the majority of women use third generation oral contraceptives [3, 4]. There is continuous development in the products according to oestrogen dosages and the types of progestins used in the oral contraceptives.

The development of new progestins potentially has different effects and side-effects. In recent years, focus has been on exploring an increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with newer generations of oral contraceptives with third and fourth generation progestins compared with second generation products [3, 5-8].

The purpose of the present study was to describe the use of hormonal contraceptives among the Danish adolescent female population, focusing on age, period and cohort effects and on types of hormonal contraceptives used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All women aged 14-50 years during the 1995-2012 period were identified by their 10-digit personal identification number through the Central Person Register. The National Registry of Medicinal Products Statistics was initiated in 1994 and is complete as from 1995. From the National Registry of Medicinal Products Statistics, relevant Anatomical-Therapeutic-Chemical classification (ATC) codes for hormonal contraceptives were identified for the 1995-2009 period. The following codes were included: G02BA03 G02BB01, G03AB, G03AB03, G03AB04, G03AB05, G03AB06, G03AC01, G03AC02, G03AC03, G03AC08, G03AC09, G03HB01, G03AA01, G03AA03, G03AA05, G03AA07, G03AA09, G03AA10, G03AA11, G03AA12 and G03AA13. From Statistics Denmark, information about finished and ongoing education was collected and updated on an annual basis, and all data relating to each individual person were merged using the 10-digit personal identification number and thereafter made anonymous at Statistics Denmark.

Analyses

Hormonal contraception-free survival curves from 1995 to 2009 for all Danish women born in 1981-1984, 1985-1988 and 1989-1992 were calculated.

A Poisson model comparing the rates in groups was used to establish the rate ratio of hormonal contraception initiation at the age of 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 years for women born in 1985-1988 and 1989-1992, respectively, compared with those born in 1981-1984.

For women born in 1960, 1965, 1970, 1975 and 1980, respectively, the number of various types of hormonal contraceptives used from 1995 to 2009 was counted and percentage distributions were calculated. Additionally, for these cohorts the numbers of breaks of valid hormonal contraceptive prescription lasting more than four weeks were counted and the percentage distribution was calculated.

The age-standardised percentage distribution of initiation type of hormonal contraception according to a) oestrogen dose or progestin only and b) progestin type in combination with oral contraceptives by education was calculated. Education was categorised as 1) elementary school (duration: 9-10 years) and no ongoing education, 2) high school (12-13 years) and no ongoing education, 3) elementary school and ongoing further education and 4) high school or concluded middle or further education and ongoing education.

The number of adolescents aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years who had redeemed a minimum of one prescription in 2001, 2005, 2009 and 2012 was calculated with hormonal contraceptive exposure grouped according to generations of progestin: first generation: norethisterone acetat; second generation: levonorgestrel or norgestimate; third generation: desogestrel or gestodene; fourth generation: drosperinone and progestogen only pills or hormone intrauterine device (IUD).

Trial registration: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. No. 2010-41-4778).

RESULTS

More than 50% of the adolescent female population in Denmark had redeemed a prescription for hormonal contraceptives at the age of 17 years (Figure 1). At the age of 20 years, approximately 85% of the female population had been prescribed hormonal contraception. The age at which hormonal contraceptives are initiated declined in the observation period. At the age of 15 years, 8% of the women born in 1981-1984, 13% of the women born in 1985-1988 and 16% of the women born in 1989-1992 had been prescribed hormonal contraceptives.

The rate ratio for initiation of hormonal contraceptives below the age of 17 years was significantly higher for girls born in 1989-92 than for girls born in 1981-1984, as it was 1.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-1.94) for initiation at 14 years of age, 1.41 (95% CI: 1.38-1.44) for initiation at 15 years of age and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.11-1.15) for initiation at 16 years of age (Table 1). Inversely, the rate ratio for initiation of hormonal contraceptives above the age of 17 years was lower for the youngest cohort than for the oldest cohort (Table 1).

Adolescents use various products more than older women do (Figure 2A). Of women born in 1980, 1975, 1970, 1965 and 1960, respectively, 29%, 32%, 38%, 48% and 59% use only on one product (Figure 2A). Adolescent girls seem to have more breaks in their use of hormonal contraceptives than older women do (Figure 2B).

There was no indication of a different use pattern for oral contraceptive according to level of education, oestrogen dosages or progestin type.

Among adolescents, the type of hormonal contraception used changed during the period. Until 2006, an increase was observed in the proportion of users of fourth generation oral contraceptives; hereafter, a rapid decline was seen (Figure 3). For third generation oral contraceptives, an increase was seen until 2010 and hereafter a decrease, whereas an increase in second generation oral contraceptives was observed from 2010 (Figure 3). The changes occurred first in the youngest adolescents aged 10-14 years. The use of progestin-only products is low, but steadily rising. This trend is more pronounced for the progestin-only pills, but the trend is also seen for hormone IUD; however, only few users are recorded.

DISCUSSION

Hormonal contraceptives are used frequently by Danish adolescent girls, and there is a trend towards a younger age at initiation of hormonal contraceptives.

This finding is in accordance with a study by Cibula [2] in which Scandinavians and Germans had the youngest average starting age for contraceptive usage and the highest proportion of women stating at the age of 16 or younger compared with other European countries. The study was based on interviews with 11,490 Europeans. In South and East European countries, less than 20% take contraceptives before the age of 16 years, and the average age for initiation is between 18 and 20 years [2].

We found that younger women tended to have more pauses and use more different products.

The pattern of use characterised by shift between products and pauses has not previously been addressed in other studies. We found a change in the type of oral contraception used after 2006: first, the use of fourth generation oral combined contraceptives decreased and thereafter also the use of third generation oral contraceptives, whereas use of second generation oral contraceptives increased. This is in accordance with 2007 national media coverage concerning observed cases of venous thromboembolism with the use of fourth generation oral contraceptives with drospirenone and a subsequent publication in 2009 of studies on an increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with third and fourth generation oral contraceptives [3, 5-8]. These findings made the Danish Institute of Rational Pharmacotherapy recommend the use of second generation oral contraceptives as first choice of drug among young women in 2010. This finding is an example of knowledge translation as national evidence-based recommendations are successfully implemented in clinical practice [9] and, additionally, it is evident that the changes occurred first among the youngest adolescents. We found that the general use of hormonal contraceptives decreased after 2010, which did not affect the number of teenage pregnancies measured by teenage abortions and teenage births as these remained constant. In Denmark, there is a total 2,200 abortions and 438/100,000 births among teenagers annually.

One strength of the present study is that it is based on a national cohort of women in an entire country. A weakness is that we do not know whether the redemption of a prescription corresponds to intake of the prescribed drug.

CONCLUSION

In Denmark, adolescent girls tend to be younger when they start using oral contraceptives. They have more pauses and shifts between products than older women do. In pursuance of national evidence-based recommendations, the type of oral contraception used has shifted since 2010; from third and fourth generation products towards older products with second generations progestins.

Correspondence: Ellen Løkkegaard, Gynækologisk-Obstetrisk Afdeling, Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark. E-mail: ellen.christine.leth.loekkegaard@regionh.dk.

Accepted: 19 August 2014

Conflicts of interest:Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at www.danmedj.dk

Referencer

REFERENCES

  1. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five european countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010;15 (Suppl 2):S42-S53.

  2. Cibula D. Women’s contraceptive practices and sexual behaviour in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13:362-75.

  3. Lidegaard O, Lokkegaard E, Svendsen AL et al. Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: National follow-up study. BMJ 2009;339:b2890.

  4. Wilson NM, Laursen M, Lidegaard O. Oral contraception in denmark 1998-2010. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:810-5.

  5. van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Vandenbroucke JP et al. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study. BMJ 2009;339:b2921.

  6. Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism from use of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens and oestrogen doses: Danish cohort study, 2001-9. BMJ 2011;343:d6423.

  7. Parkin L, Sharples K, Hernandez RK et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel: nested case-control study based on UK general practice research database. BMJ 2011;342:d2139.

  8. Jick SS, Hernandez RK. Risk of non-fatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives containing drospirenone compared with women using oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel: Case-control study using united states claims data. BMJ 2011;342:d2151.

  9. Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:6-10.