Content area


Characteristics of Danish children registered with and pharmacologically treated for hypertension


Adam Femerling Langhoff1, Malene Landbo Børresen1, 2, Malgorzata Pulczynska Wason3, Dorthe Lisbeth Jeppesen1, 4, Mette Neland5 & Dina Cortes1, 4

1) Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Hvidovre Hospital, 2) Department of Epidemiological Research, The State Serum Institute, 3) Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, 4) Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 5) Hans Christian Andersen Children’s Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

Dan Med J 2021;68(4):A08200609


INTRODUCTION: A previous study found that 0.04% of Danish children were registered with hypertension, among whom 54% were treated pharmacologically. Our study describes pharmacologically treated cases at the onset of antihypertensive therapy, noting whether the evaluation of target-organ damage could be improved.

METHODS: Our review of the medical records of children under 16 years living in Central and Eastern Denmark from April 2014 to May 2015 found that 119 children were registered with an International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition diagnosis of hypertension and treated with antihypertensive medicine.

RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 61% boys and 39% girls (p = 0.01). The majority of patients (80%) had secondary hypertension. Renal aetiology was found in 52%. Echocardiography, retinal examination and examination for proteinuria were undertaken in 77%, 74% and 100%, respectively. Both echocardiography and retinal examination were undertaken in 61% of patients with renal aetiology. Among the remaining patients, 95% and 89% underwent these examinations, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001).

Abnormal echocardiography, abnormal retinal examination and proteinuria were found in 39%, 16% and 66%, respectively, of patients with renal aetiology and in 30%, 24% and 35% of the remaining patients (p = 0.3, p = 0.4 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Examination for target-organ damage was performed less often in patients with hypertension of renal aetiology than in the remaining patients. Examination for target-organ damage is recommended in all hypertensive children to determine whether treatment is indicated to reduce long-term morbidity.

FUNDING: The study received funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, grant number NNF15OC0015702 and from Amager-Hvidovre Hospital Foundation.


Hypertension affects approximately 25% of adults and is the leading risk factor for increased mortality due to cardiovascular disease in the adult population worldwide [1]. In an earlier population-based study including 553,784 Danish children < 16 years of age, only 222 (0.04%) were registered with hypertension and 119 (0.02%) were treated pharmacologically [2]. These very low figures may reflect that no systematic measuring of blood pressure is in place in children in Denmark. Previous clinical studies from the US have reported a 2-4% prevalence of hypertension in children [3, 4] and established that 0.1-0.15% of children aged 3-18 years receive antihypertensive pharmacological treatment [5, 6]. Children with hypertension are likely to experience accelerated vascular ageing [1]. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of hypertensive youths can reverse target-organ damage [1, 7, 8]. Therefore, early treatment is essential to reduce the lifetime burden of hypertension.

It is recommended to assess whether target-organ damage is present when hypertension is diagnosed in children [1, 9-11]. Antihypertensive pharmacological treatment is indicated in cases of target-organ damage, stage 2 hypertension (blood pressure > 99th percentile + 5 mmHg for age and sex), symptomatic hypertension, secondary hypertension and persistent hypertension despite non-pharmacological treatment [1, 9-11].

The aim of this study was to characterise the aetiology of pharmacologically treated paediatric hypertension; to evaluate whether pharmacologically treated hypertensive children had undergone examination for target-organ damage and, if so, to grade the organ damage according to stage of hypertension. We hypothesised that all pharmacologically treated hypertensive children had undergone examination for target-organ damage at the initiation of their antihypertensive medical treatment.

Echocardiogram performed by one of the study authors. The child’s mother approved the use of the photograph in the article.Echocardiogram performed by one of the study authors. The child’s mother approved the use of the photograph in the article.


We evaluated a cohort of 119 children < 16 years of age living in central and eastern parts of Denmark registered with an International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (ICD-10) code of hypertension between April 2014 and May 2015 and pharmacologically treated for hypertension. At that time, 16 years was the upper age limit for patients at paediatric departments in Denmark. The cohort was extracted from a larger cohort created using the Danish National Patient Register and electronic data from ten paediatric departments in Central and Eastern Denmark [2]. We reviewed the medical records and noted whether patients had hypertension based on the information in the case reports and according to current guidelines. Hypertension was categorised as stage 1 (blood pressure at 95th-99th + 5 mmHg for age and sex) or stage 2 hypertension [9-11]. Based on associated diagnoses registered in the medical records, each patient was classified with primary or secondary hypertension [2, 9, 10]. Moreover, we extracted anthropometric data (age, sex, height, weight) and family history of hypertension if patients had symptomatic hypertension and data from any examination for target-organ damage.

Data were collected at the time of diagnosis and when antihypertensive pharmacological treatment was initiated. If the interval between these two time-points was < 3 months, the first date was registered; otherwise, the interval was calculated in months.

Patients were classified as having renal aetiology in cases of reno-parenchymal disease, for example congenital renal anomalies [2].

Target-organ damage was assessed by gathering information on glomerular filtration rate, urine analysis for protein, results of echocardiography and retinal examination if these examinations had been performed at the initiation of antihypertensive pharmacological treatment.

Glomerular filtration rate was either determined by chrome ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)-clearance or estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Cohort Study formula based on cystatin-C, creatinine and urea [12] or by the Schwartz formula [10]. Patients were classified according to chronic kidney disease stages with those younger than one year based on converting tables [13, 14]. Patients with a kidney transplant were classified with abnormal glomerular filtration rate.

Proteinuria was defined as > 0.1 g protein/m2/24-hour urine; but for children < 0.5 years, the limit was 0.2 g protein/m2/24-hour urine [15, 16]. If a 24-hour urine collection was not available, proteinuria was defined as a urine dipstick with at least 1+ for protein and at least 2+ in children < 0.5 years of age [15, 16].

Left ventricular hypertrophy was determined from standard echocardiographic measurements by M-mode, including measurements of end diastolic left ventricular and interventricular septal diameter and/or a left ventricular posterior wall thickness above two Z-scores on the Dubois formula [9].

Obesity was defined as an ISO Body Mass Index of at least 30 or an ICD-10 diagnosis of obesity [10].

If a certain group of patients contained < 5, the number was censored in accordance with The Danish Health Data Authority requirement that analysis of data should not make patients identifiable.


The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Danish Health Authority (3-3013-1172/1) as well as the Danish Data Protection Agency (2008-54-0472).


Results are presented as median and interquartile range in tables and range in text for continuous variables, and in absolute counts and percentages for categorical variables. Differences in proportions were analysed by binominal test and χ2-test. Differences in continuous variables were analysed by Mann-Whitney tests. p-values < 0.05 in two-sided tests were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted in R Studio and Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, updated in 2013.

Trial registration: not relevant.


Age, gender and stage of hypertension

The cohort consisted of 61% boys and 39% girls (p = 0.01), Table 1.

At the initiation of antihypertensive pharmacological treatment, more girls than boys were > 12 years of age, 16/46 (35%) versus 13/73 (18%), (p = 0.04).

Most of the children with stage 2 hypertension, 56/62 (90%), received antihypertensive medicine within three months of their diagnosis, compared with 36/57 (63%) of those with stage 1 hypertension, (p = 0.001).


Secondary hypertension affected 95/119 (80%) patients; of these, 62/119 (52%) presented renal aetiology, Table 2.

Patients with primary hypertension tended to be older, median 11.1 years (range: 0-15.7 years), at the initiation of their pharmacological treatment than patients with secondary hypertension, median 6.7 years (range: 0-15.6 years), (p = 0.07).

Assessment of target-organ damage

All patients underwent renal and urine examinations, whereas only 92/119 (77%) underwent echocardiography and 89/119 (75%) underwent retinal examination, Table 3.

Patients with renal aetiology of hypertension more often had chronic kidney disease (44/62; 69%) than the remaining patients (7/57, 13%; p < 0.001); the same applied to patients with renal aetiology of proteinuria (41/62, 66% vs. 20/57, 35%; p < 0.001).

Patients who were pharmacologically treated for primary hypertension underwent echocardiography, (23/24, 96%) and retinal examination (22/24, 92%) more often than those treated for secondary hypertension (69/95, 73% and 67/95, 71%), respectively (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05), Table 3.

For patients with renal aetiology, both echocardiography and retinal examination were performed in 38/62 (61%) of cases, whereas the remaining patients underwent echocardiography in 54/57 (95%) of cases (p < 0.001) and 51/57 (89%) of cases (p < 0.001), Table 3.

Abnormal echocardiography including left ventricular hypertrophy was found in 15/38 (39%) of the patients with renal aetiology and in 16/54 (30%) of the remaining patients (p = 0.3). Abnormal retinal examination was found in 6/38 (16%) of the patients with renal aetiology and in 12/51 (24%) of the remaining patients (p = 0.4), Table 3.

Patients with stage 2 hypertension more frequently underwent retinal examination (55/62, 89%) than patients with stage 1 hypertension (34/57, 60%; p < 0.001).


Symptomatic hypertension was registered in 45/119 (38%) of patients, most often headache which affected 29/119 (24%) of the patients. About half of these patients (16/29, 55%) had headaches > 3 times a week.

Obesity and family history

Obesity was reported in 17/119 (14%) of patients, and more often in those with primary (7/24, 29%) than with secondary hypertension (10/95, 11%; p = 0.02). Based on family history, at least one parent had diagnosed hypertension in 17/119 (14%) of patients; of these, 8/24 (33%) had primary hypertension and 9/95 (9%) had secondary hypertension, (p < 0.005).


In this retrospective cohort study, secondary hypertension was identified in 80% of children < 16 years of age who had been registered with hypertension and treated pharmacologically. Renal aetiology was found in 52% of these patients, which is in line with previously reported figures [1, 9-11]. All present patients underwent renal and urine examinations. Both echocardiography and retinal examination were performed in 61% of patients with renal aetiology and less frequently than in the remaining patients. Consequently, our hypothesis that all the present patients had undergone examination for target-organ damage at the initiation of their antihypertensive medical treatment was not confirmed. A worrying incidence of cardiovascular subclinical organ damage in children following kidney transplantation has been reported with up to 41% of patients suffering from uncontrolled or untreated hypertension [17]. Such patients may suffer cardiovascular organ damage due to other causes, but patients with renal diseases have a high risk of future complications due to cardiovascular disease [18]. Hence, it is of concern that 39% of the present hypertensive children with renal aetiology did not undergo evaluation for target-organ damage before their antihypertensive pharmacological treatment was initiated. We speculate that for some children with chronic kidney disease, the focus may have been on hypertension without awareness of the need to assess any target-organ damage. Based on the high risk of cardiovascular disease in renal patients, we find early detection of target-organ damage important in such patients.

Paediatric patients with hypertension rarely present with overt symptoms of cardiovascular disease. Assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy remains a cornerstone when diagnosing target-organ damage in paediatric hypertension [9]. We found that 39% of the examined children with hypertension of renal aetiology had abnormal echocardiography, as had the remaining patients in our analysis, which is comparable with another study [9]. It might be of concern that, as not all patients were examined for target-organ damage, some hypertensive children might miss treatment that could reverse target-organ damage [1, 7]. Blood pressure can be controlled effectively in hypertensive children by pharmacological treatment [8, 19]. Clinical data are lacking, but antihypertensive drugs that effectively reduce blood pressure lead to regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, reduction of intima-media thickness and microalbuminuria in childhood [1, 7, 8].

In our cohort, 66% of patients with acquired renal aetiology had proteinuria at initiation of antihypertensive pharmacological treatment, which is consistent with other studies [9]. In children with chronic kidney disease, strict blood pressure control may lead to less progressive kidney disease [1].

A total of 20% of the present patients had retinal changes at the initiation of pharmacological treatment. This percentage is higher than the 9% found in a previous study that excluded hypertensive patients with diabetes and renal disease [20]. Based on European guidelines, routine application of fundoscopy should be restricted to assessing the presence of hypertensive encephalopathy or malignant hypertension [11]; this, however, is not the case for American and Danish guidelines [9, 10].

Headache was the most prevalent symptom at diagnosis in children treated pharmacologically for hypertension; this highlights the importance of blood pressure measurement in children with headache.

Strengths and limitations

The analyses were possible owing to the strong Danish tradition for health registers and the high quality of these registers [2]. Moreover, it is a strength that all medical records were available for review and that antihypertensive medications were prescribed in accordance with national and international guidelines [1, 9-11].

The limitations of the study were its retrospective design and the fact that diagnosis, treatment and examinations were carried out by different physicians, although paediatricians in Denmark in general follow national guidelines [10]. Moreover, it is a limitation that, in Denmark, children are not screened systematically for hypertension. Those who were diagnosed and treated might therefore represent a special group with a high risk of hypertension [2]. We included patients who were registered with an ICD-10 diagnosis of hypertension. However, some children with hypertension and other diagnoses, e.g. cancer, may remain unregistered for hypertension as the diagnosis of hypertension was of lesser importance and therefore not recorded. Consequently, some hypertensive patients might not have been identified in our study.


Secondary hypertension was identified in 80% of children < 16 years of age who were registered with hypertension and treated pharmacologically. The majority (52%) had hypertension of renal aetiology. Only 61% of these patients underwent a full evaluation for target-organ damage prior to initiation of antihypertensive pharmacological treatment. We recommend that all hypertensive children undergo a full examination for target-organ damage as this may potentially reduce their long-term morbidity.

Correspondence Adam Femerling Langhoff. E-mail:
Accepted 17 February 2021
Conflicts of interest none. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the article at
Acknowledgements The authors take this opportunity to express their gratitude to the following paediatricians: Ida Maria Schmidt and Hanne Nørgaard, Rigshospitalet, Ebbe Thisted, Zealand University Hospital – Roskilde, Jens-Christian Holm, Holbæk Hospital, Lise Bjerglund, Nykøbing F. Hospital, Pernille Mathiesen, Slagelse Hospital, Jannet Svensson, Herlev Hospital, and Jürgen Schwarzenburg for provision of information about the patients registered with hypertension in their local medical registers. Lastly, we thank Mikael Anderson, The State Serum Institute, for assistance with data from the national Danish registers and Graham Wason for initial English language editing.
References can be found with the article at
Cite this as Dan Med J 2021;68(4):A08200609

Bib ref: 
Dan Med J 2021;68(4):A08200609


  1. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20171904.

  2. Langhoff AF, Børresen ML, Wason MP et al. National data with high validity and completeness showed that only 0.04% of Danish children had been registered with diagnosed hypertension. Acta Paediatr 2020;109:1458-64.

  3. Jackson SL, Zefeng Z, Wiltz JL et al. Hypertension Among Youths - United States, 2001-2016. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2018;67:758-62.

  4. Bell C, Samuel J, Samuels J. Prevalence of hypertension in children: applying the New American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guideline. Hypertens 2019;73:148-52.

  5. Liberman JN, Berger JE, Lewis M. Prevalence of antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and dyslipidemic prescription medication use among children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:357-64.

  6. Lo JC, Sinaiko A, Chandra M et al. Prehypertension and hypertension in community-based pediatric practice. Pediatr Off J Am Acad Pediatr 2013;131:e415-e424.

  7. Litwin M. Why should we screen for arterial hypertension in children and adolescents? Pediatr Nephrol 2018;33:83-92.

  8. Burrello J, Erhardt EM, Saint-Hilary G et al. Pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension in children and adolescents: A network meta-analysis. Hypertension 2018;72:306-13.

  9. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004;114:555-76.

  10. Winding L, Wason M, Nørgaard H et al. DPS klaringsrapport om hypertension. (17 Dec 2020).

  11. Lurbe E, Agabiti-Rosei E, Cruickshank JK et al. 2016 European Society ofHypertension guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. J Hypertens 2009;27:1719-42.

  12. Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012A;82:445-53.

  13. Hogg RJ, Furth S, Lemley KV et al. National Kidney Foundation’s Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in children and adolescents: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Pediatrics 2003;111:1416-21.

  14. Piepsz A, Tondeur M, Ham H. Revisiting normal (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance values in children. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1477-82.

  15. Hogg RJ, Portman RJ, Milliner D et al. Evaluation and management of proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome in children: recommendations from a pediatric nephrology panel established at the National Kidney Foundation Conference on Proteinuria, Albuminuria, Risk, Assessment, Detection, and Eliminati. Pediatrics 2000;41-6.

  16. Dansk Nefrologisk Selskab, Dansk Pædiatrisk Selskab, Dansk Selskab for Klinisk Biokemi. [Chronic kidney disease: analytic methods and clinical evaluation. Recommendations for interpretation of glomerular filtration and albuminuria]. nyresygdom 2015 endelig, 14-08-15.pdf (17 Dec 2020).

  17. Borchert-Mörlins B, Thurn D, Schmidt BMW et al. Factors associated with cardiovascular target organ damage in children after renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2017;32:2143-54.

  18. Foster BJ, Dahhou M, Zhang X et al. Change in mortality risk over time in young kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2011;2011;11:2432-42.

  19. Kollias A, Dafni M, Poulidakis E et al. Out-of-office blood pressure and target organ damage in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2014;32:2315-31.

  20. Foster BJ, Ali H, Mamber S et al. Prevalence and severity of hypertensive retinopathy in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2009;48:926-30.


Add new comment

Right side