Skip to main content

Prolonged length of hospital stay in Denmark after nephrectomy

Nessn H. Azawi1, Tom Christensen1, Anette Lykke Petri2 & Henrik Kehlet3,

1. jun. 2012
8 min.

Faktaboks

Fakta

Emphasis on surgical outcomes has traditionally focused on aspects of mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). Implementation of the principles of fast-track surgical programmes has shown a decrease in hospital stay from eight days to four days after open nephrectomies [1] and to approx. two days after laparoscopic surgery [2, 3]. Furthermore, laparoscopic donor-nephrectomy can be performed with approximately 1-day’s hospital stay [4]. The aim of this study was to elucidate the regional distribution of nephrectomies in Denmark during the 2000-2009-period focussing on LOS and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was based on data extracted from the National Patient Registry for the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2009. All admissions with the following operation codes were included: KKAC00 (simple nephrectomy), KKAC01 (laparoscopic nephrectomy), KKAC20 (nephro-ureterectomy), and KKAC21 (laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomy). Postoperative LOS was defined as the primary postoperative stay, including transfer to another department or hospital and any readmissions within 30 days. Mortality was death ≤ 30 days as recorded in the Central Population Registry (CPR). A high-activity department was defined as department had performed > 100 nephrectomies/3 years in the 2000-2009-period. A low-activity department was defined as department had performed < 50 nephrectomies/3 years. Trial registration was not relevant.

Statistics

We used descriptive data, Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the available times, and Fisher’s exact test for comparison of group mortality. Further, a p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Trial registration: not relevant.

RESULTS

During the 2000–2009-period, a total of 6,790 nephrectomies were performed in Denmark (Table 1) on 2,849 women (42%) and 3,941 men (58%). The median age was 63 years (Table 1). Operations were performed in 33 urological departments in 2000, a number which had fallen to 20 departments in 2009. At the end of 2009, six departments had performed > 100 operations; nine departments 50-100 operations; and five departments < 50 operations within the past three years. The operations included 3,835 (56.4%) open nephrectomies, 1,377 (20.2%) laparoscopic nephrectomies, 1,149 (17%) open nephro-ureterectomies and 429 (6.4%) laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomies. Overall, 26.6% of the oper- ations were performed with laparoscopic techniques.

The mean mortality was 2.6% in the 2000-2004 period, decreasing to 1.7% (p < 0.05) in 2005-2009. The total mean mortality was 2.1% in 2000-2009 (Table 2). The mean LOS was 10.1 days in 2000-2004, decreasing to 8.3 days (p > 0.05) in the 2005-2009-period. The mean LOS was 9.1 days in 2000-2009. There was no difference in mortality or LOS between departments with high versus low activity in any periods (p > 0.05) (Table 2). In laparoscopic versus open nephrectomies during 2005-2009, the mean LOS was 6.4 versus 9.0 days, respectively (p < 0.05), and mortality 0.9% versus 2.1%, respectively (p < 0.05).

In laparoscopic versus open nephro-ureterectomy, the mean LOS was 7.4 days versus 10.8 days, respecti- vely (p < 0.05), but with similar mortality (2.1% versus 1.9%, respectively) for the 2005-2009-period (p > 0.05) (Table 2). In open nephrectomy versus open nephro-ureterectomy, the mean LOS was 9.8 days versus 10.9 days, respectively (p>0.05) and mortality was 2.5% versus 2.3%, respectively (p > 0.05) for the 2000-2009-period (Table 2).

The same trend was found for the 2000-2004 and the 2005-2009-period. In laparoscopic nephrectomy versus laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomy, the mean LOS was 6.3 days versus 7.3 days, respectively (p > 0.05), and the mortality was 0.9% versus 1.9%, respectively (p > 0.05) (Table 2) for the 2000-2009-period. Nephrectomies performed by laparoscopic technique increased from 7.6% to 30.8% (p < 0.05), while laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomies increased from 1.7% to 10.3% (p < 0.05) from the 2000-2004 to the 2005-2009-period.

DISCUSSION

This study of 6,790 patients who underwent nephrectomy in Denmark during the 2000-2009-period shows that operations were done in 33 departments in 2000; a number that had fallen to 20 departments at the end of 2009.

The Danish results are comparable to those reported in foreign studies regarding mortality after nephrectomies, 2.1% versus 0.6-2% [5, 6] for the 2000-2009-period. Postoperative mortality after laparoscopic procedures was lower than mortality observed after open procedures, a finding which is also comparable to the results of foreign studies [7, 8]. Patient selection for laparoscopic nephrectomy may play a role because it may be linked to tumour stage and available surgical expertise, factors that cannot be evaluated in our study.

Postoperative mortality in the 2000-2004-period was 2.6%, decreasing to 1.7% during the 2005-2009- period. This reflects the influence of specialisation at fewer departments as well as the increased use of laparoscopy; again factors that cannot be evaluated in the present study.

The lack of statistical significance for the differences between departments in relation to mortality and LOS may be due to the low number of patients and the large variability between the hospitals’ results. Since 2009, the National Board of Health in Denmark has implemented a plan for specialised treatment. As of 2011, nephrectomies with malignant indication in Denmark have been centralised to 11 hospitals. As others have found a relationship between volume and mortality, this will hopefully improve national results [9].

The mean LOS was 9.1 days during the 2000-2009-period, which is not comparable to foreign studies which report LOS averages of 2-4 days [10-12]. This difference may be due to suboptimal implementation of the fast-track principles in the Danish context, which may reduce postoperative hospital stay to four days after open nephrectomy, as previously reported in Danish studies [1].

CONCLUSION

Mortality decreased significantly during the 2000-2009-period. However, the small decrease in LOS (from 10.1 days during 2000-2004 to 8.3 days during 2005-2009) suggests that the fast-track methodology has not been implemented [13, 14]. Hopefully, fast-track surgery programmes together with laparoscopy will lead to a further decrease in LOS as well as in mortality.

Correspondence: Nessn H. Azawi , Urologisk Afdeling D, Roskilde Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. nesa@regionsjaelland.dk

Accepted: 29 March 2012

Conflicts of interest:none

Acknowledgement:Steen Rasmussen, Documentation of Public Health, National Board of Health, for creating the tables.

#PLACEHOLDER4

Referencer

REFERENCES

  1. Firoozfard B, Christensen T, Kristensen JK et al. Fast- track open transperitonealnephrectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37:305-8.

  2. Recart A, Duchene D, White FP et al. Efficacy and safety of fast-track recovery strategy for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol 2005;19:1165-9.

  3. Christopher SNG, Inderbir SG, Anup PR et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcome. J Urol 2005;174:846-9.

  4. Kuo PC, Johanson LB, Sitzmann JV et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with a 23-hour stay. Ann Surg 2000;231:772-9.

  5. Corman JM, Penson DF, Hur K et al. Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the national Veterans administration surgical quality improvement program. Br J Urol 2000;86: 782-9.

  6. Mejean A, Vogt B, Quazza JE et al. Mortality and morbidity after nephrec- tomy for renal cell carcinoma using a transperitoneal anterior subcostal incision. Eur Urol 1999;36:298-302.

  7. Simon SD, Castle CP, Ferrigni RG et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Urol 2004;171:1447-50.

  8. Seifman BD, Montie JE, Wolf Jr S et al. Prospective comparison between hand-assisted laparoscopic and open surgical nephroureterectomy for urothelial cell carcinoma. Urology 2001;57:133-7.

  9. Taub DA, Miller DC, Cowan JA et al. Impact of surgical volume on mortality and length of stay after nephrectomy. Urology 2004;63:862-7.

  10. Cheema IA, Manecksha RP, Murphy M et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience with 120 cases. Ir Med J 2010;103:49-51.

  11. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153-9.

  12. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laproscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2005;173:38-41.

  13. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:189-98.

  14. Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery – an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396:585-90.